Recent Comments:

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 2:07PM So Joystiq let me see if I got this right:

OK
"heh, posting this is proof joystiq's business model is one word: FANBOYZ!!!!"
OK
"Well I'm from Texas too.
Well I live in Texas, born in Mexico.
I was born and raised and still live in Houston."
What relevance to the article this has...eludes me.

Not OK
"You get on me for posting fanboy rants yet you post this crap...from the most unreliable analyst in the videogame world.

Hypocrites...you are."

Not a fanboy rant

"So, where is the power of the Cell?

Face it! Xbox 360 is a better value than the PS3. Its supposed to be a gaming machine, not a protein folding, movie player player machine that happens to play some games, and besides that, it forces comapnies to delay games.

Everything that the PS3 can do, the 360 also can."

Give me a break...na na na...I'm better than you.

Not OK...from a different thread

"Sony paid for La exclusivity? And you know this how?
EA has said that the PS3 IS the LEAD platform for the new NFS.

I justify the delay for GTA on the Cramped60 for the same reason that Mass Effect will be delayed. (yet again) the Mass Effect developers have stated that they will fit the game on a single DVD but that they had to cut out parts of the game."

You know what Joystiq...I will save you the trouble of banning me. I will not post here. I had no idea that a simple videogame blog could be so pompous as to think that some harmless banter is a bad thing, yet other banter is OK.

Maybe you get off threatening the banstick. Maybe it completes your day.

For me, life is too short to get so upset and bent out of shape over some smack talk. Whatever floats your boat Joystiq.

Complaining about the stuff I post when none of it is threatening to others, nor violent in any way is ridiculous.

I think it is hilarious that you take your site so seriously and single out a few posters here and there but DO NOTHING about personal attacks directed at them.

Like I said, you Joystiq are a bunch of hypocrites...you live for the fanboy wars...this is how you get hits to your site.

Maybe someday I can be as cool as you and make my own blog so that I too can threaten the banstick on harmless smack talk.

To those of you who I have had fun discussions back and forth, I say thank you for giving me some laughs.

Later

Hard Gay
GodisaMyth
Killjebus









PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:42PM Chris,

Am I not allowed an opinion? I was not the 1st one to say that this thread invites a fanboy war. Seriously, what is it that I say that is different? I just do not understand.

Please email me so that you can clarify, at this point I have absolutely NO IDEA what I can of cannot say in a videogame blog.

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:22PM Fernando,

You just made my day with that comment. Truly funny, funny stuff.

Better value...ha

By the way, the most successful console of ALL TIME was a DVD player that just happened to play games.

C'mon....think b4 you post.

PS...is the Cramped/RROD60 also a better value because it will inevitably break on you?

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:18PM Do you not think that they would? Take 2 is bleeding alot of money right now, and if they could release the 360 version now....they would.

It is obvious that they are not used to developing on 2 different platforms simultaneously. That, more than anything is the most likely real reason.

Both machines, vastly different architectures, a huge game=enormous difficulties across the board.

Epic seems to be doing fine on a PS3...more so than the 360, according to Mark Rein in an interview from this blog.

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:13PM I think he uses a Monkey. He puts different explanations in front of the monkey in the form of blocks. Whatever the monkey picks...is the reason.

The same thing Dubya does when he makes his decisions.

He's a decider.

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:09PM It does indeed.

Hypocrites they are.

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:08PM Joystiq,

You get on me for posting fanboy rants yet you post this crap...from the most unreliable analyst in the videogame world.

Hypocrites...you are.

PlayStation 3 responsible for GTA IV delay, surmises Pachter

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 1:06PM I think instead of taking anything that Patcher says seriously....I will post what N'gai Croal said.

N'Gai has actual reason and logic in his response...Patcher? Yeah, right, when has he been right on anything?

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/levelup/archive/2007/08/02/speculation-on-the-factors-behind-gta-iv-delay.aspx

Star Trek: Conquest beaming onto Wii and PS2 this holiday

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 11:52AM Christopher,

Copied from a different thread.

I am curious, was there no logic or reason in my 1st post? If you think that there was not, please let me know. I am not trying to be a smart ass, I would just like to know once and for all what boundries you have in mind when it comes to my comments on this blog.

I come here for information...and to have some fun.
I NEVER personally attack anyone, even though under my former names I was personally attacked on a regular basis for no other reason than my name.

I am not complaining about being attacked, I could care less, they are just words from an uninformed/ignorant person.

Do you not want me to inject some fun in my posts? My 1st post usually does include a valid arguement and facts. After I get responses I like to have a little fun with the many other regular posters on this site.

Please, email me personally so that we can discuss this so that I completely understand what it is I can and cannot do.

I will copy this post to serveral threads so that I know you will see it.

Thank you.

skate: demo on XBLM Aug. 15, in stores in September

Joystiq

Aug 3rd 2007 11:50AM Christopher,

I am curious, was there no logic or reason in my 1st post? If you think that there was not, please let me know. I am not trying to be a smart ass, I would just like to know once and for all what boundries you have in mind when it comes to my comments on this blog.

I come here for information...and to have some fun.
I NEVER personally attack anyone, even though under my former names I was personally attacked on a regular basis for no other reason than my name.

I am not complaining about being attacked, I could care less, they are just words from an uninformed/ignorant person.

Do you not want me to inject some fun in my posts? My 1st post usually does include a valid arguement and facts. After I get responses I like to have a little fun with the many other regular posters on this site.

Please, email me personally so that we can discuss this so that I completely understand what it is I can and cannot do.

I will copy this post to serveral threads so that I know you will see it.

Thank you.